1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites

Stasi Libel Verdict

DW staff (jc)June 27, 2007

In the first-ever ruling of its kind, a Berlin court has convicted an ex-East German secret police officer of libel. The officer verbally attacked a director of a museum devoted to the Stasi's dark historical legacy.

https://p.dw.com/p/B3mF
Hubertus Knabe
Former Stasi officers have emerged from the shadows and become more vocal in recent yearsImage: Fotomontage/DW

The ruling, which was handed down on Tuesday, found that former Stasi officer Wolfgang Schmidt had gone beyond the bounds of free speech in criticizing museum director Hubertus Knabe.

In an open letter in March 2006, Schmidt characterized Knabe as someone who "could be described as an inciter of the people." The concept of incitement has extremely negative connotations in Germany since it is often associated with racist agitation under the Nazis.

Deutschland Stasi-Experte Hubertus Knabe
Hubertus KnabeImage: picture-alliance/ ZB

Knabe runs a former Stasi prison in the Hohenschönhausen district of Berlin that has been turned into a museum and a memorial for the victims of the East German secret police.

The court ruled that Schmidt, the speaker of an organization representing self-proclaimed Stasi "insiders," had knowingly spread a falsehood, fining him 2,100 euros ($2,800).

Continuing Controversy

Knabe welcomed the ruling.

"For the first time, a Berlin court has set limits upon the activities of former Stasi officers and their organizations," he said." I hope the ruling makes it more difficulty to drag Stasi victims and their memorials through the mud."

Stasi files
It will take years for researchers to sort through the Stasi's copious filesImage: dpa - Bildfunk

The court case was but the latest incident in an ongoing debate about what role former Stasi operatives should play in Germany's coming-to-terms with the Eastern part of the country's communist past.

Former Stasi employees have been occasionally enlisted in efforts to shed light on that organization's activities. But critics have complained that their statements are often unreliable and motivated by historical revisionism.